's time, a question of high importance.Men of all parties in the Church of England were ever inclined to allow great weight to the voice of constituted authority in matters which did not seem to them to touch the very life and substance executive furniture toronto of religion.' When Marshall, in the course of controversy, reproached the Baptists with separation, Tombs answered that he must blame the persons, not the general body.The relation of the English Church to Nonconformity may accordingly be considered executive furniture toronto separately.This sort of Episcopal charge to the clergy of another Communion was received, it is said, with a no less cordial feeling than that in which it was written.The correspondence between the English primate and the doctors of the Sorbonne is an episode which stands executive furniture toronto by itself, quite apart from any other incidents in the Church history of the time.Hence while, on the one hand, they did their utmost to persuade the Dissenters to give up what seemed to them needless, and almost frivolous scruples, they were also very anxious that all ground for these scruples should be as far as possible removed.'Baxter protested in executive furniture toronto his latest works, that the body to which he belonged was in favour of a National State Church.The case would probably have been different if any schemes for union or comprehension had still been under consideration.The excited controversy which was being waged among theologians was but one sign of the general uneasiness that had been executive furniture toronto prevailing.This animosity was relieved by a mitigating influence in one direction only.Skeats remarks of the measure proposed in 1689, 'Calamy's assertion, that if it had been adopted, it would in all probability have brought into the Church two thirds of the Dissenters, indicates the almost entire agreement of the executive furniture toronto Independents with the Presbyterians, concerning the expedience of adopting it.
Leave Your Response